Got pics developed
Mar. 8th, 2003 07:51 pmAt last, I've got through a roll of 40 shots. Took them to boots. Scanned them. Boots don't do very good APS packaging. They used to use nice carboard boxes, but not any more it seems. I'll take my business elsewhere next time.
Anyway, here's a selection of them. The robots from Robot Wars From the Model Engineerring exhibition I went to just after Christmas
A few random snaps of the Star Trek Adventure in Hyde Park
I'll have to criticise my photos though - All of them are of things. No people. This is not like me at all. I'll have to make amends. Perhaps I should actually get my camera out more often. It's quite nice taking pics after all.
Also it takes far too long to get them from being taken onto a computer, which would appear to be everyone's preferred medium for viewing them. Especially people here.
If anyone has any opinioon on digital cameras (And that includes you, Dylan), then I'm after one. I want something with at least 3 million pixels, and a decent optical zoom. 6x would be quite nice. Anyone got any suggestions?
Anyway, here's a selection of them. The robots from Robot Wars From the Model Engineerring exhibition I went to just after Christmas
A few random snaps of the Star Trek Adventure in Hyde Park
I'll have to criticise my photos though - All of them are of things. No people. This is not like me at all. I'll have to make amends. Perhaps I should actually get my camera out more often. It's quite nice taking pics after all.
Also it takes far too long to get them from being taken onto a computer, which would appear to be everyone's preferred medium for viewing them. Especially people here.
If anyone has any opinioon on digital cameras (And that includes you, Dylan), then I'm after one. I want something with at least 3 million pixels, and a decent optical zoom. 6x would be quite nice. Anyone got any suggestions?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-08 09:53 pm (UTC)Thanks for pointing that out. One of my numerous major social failings is that I find it quite hard to tell when I'm giving sensible explanations and when I'm just blathering on and on in a whole bunch of techy-laden jargon no-one wants to hear. Just a peril of having replaced my brain with camera equipment. Sorry Neil! Let me know if you want me to have a go at a shorter, clearer suggestion...
Re:
Date: 2003-03-08 11:04 pm (UTC)Techy laden Jargon
Date: 2003-03-09 12:13 am (UTC)